The Hidden Keys to Expanding Your CPG Brand into LATAM & U.S. Markets
- Julio Hernandez

- Aug 15, 2025
- 5 min read
Updated: Mar 2
CPG CONSULTING

When I look back on my career, one theme stands out consistently: I've always been drawn to markets in motion.
Dynamic, complex, full of competing forces pulling in different directions at the same time. That's what LATAM and the U.S. have in common. And over nearly two decades leading market expansions for global CPG brands across Latin America, the Caribbean, and the United States, I've seen the same mistakes made repeatedly by companies that had every resource available to avoid them.
The product was usually fine. The brand had genuine equity. The team was capable. What failed was almost always the same thing: the assumption that what worked somewhere else would work here.
What Most Companies Overlook When They Expand
Market expansion in CPG is not a logistics problem. It is a strategic problem dressed up as a logistics problem. The companies that treat it primarily as the former spend the first two years fixing the latter.
Three factors get consistently underestimated, and each one has cost brands I've observed millions of dollars and years of momentum.
Local Consumer Behavior Is Not a Variable, It Is the Constraint
The most dangerous assumption in CPG market expansion is that your core consumer travels with you. It doesn't. What works in Miami does not automatically work in Mexico City. What resonates with a second-generation Mexican-American family in Los Angeles does not necessarily connect with a first-generation Colombian household in Bogotá.
These are not surface-level differences in taste preference. They are structural differences in purchase occasion, price sensitivity, channel behavior, family decision-making dynamics, and the cultural meaning that certain product categories carry. A premium positioning that signals aspiration in one market can signal inaccessibility in another. A clean label that drives growth in the U.S. natural channel may be irrelevant in a market where that convention doesn't exist yet.
The brands that expand successfully invest in understanding the specific consumer they are talking to in each market before they build the go-to-market strategy. Not a regional consumer archetype. The specific person, in the specific context, making the specific decision.
Route-to-Market Strategy Makes or Breaks the Launch
Distribution in LATAM is one of the most fragmented and relationship-dependent environments in global CPG. The modern trade infrastructure that allows a brand to enter a U.S. market through a handful of national retail relationships simply does not exist at the same scale across most of Latin America.
In many markets, 50 to 70% of consumer goods volume still flows through traditional trade, the small, independently owned stores that serve as the primary shopping channel for a significant portion of the population. Winning in those markets means building distributor relationships that are fundamentally different from the retailer partnerships that drive U.S. go-to-market strategy. It means understanding how to structure trade terms for a channel that operates on cash velocity, limited storage capacity, and personal relationships with sales representatives.
Getting the route-to-market wrong in LATAM is not a recoverable mistake in the short term. The distribution relationships that drive volume in these markets take time to build, and a brand that enters through the wrong partners, or with the wrong commercial structure, often spends its first two years unwinding damage rather than building momentum.
Positioning and Premiumization Are Not Transferable by Default
The third underestimated factor is how brand positioning lands in a new market context. In the brand's home market, years of marketing investment have shaped how consumers perceive the product. That context does not exist in a new market. The brand arrives without its history, without its cultural associations, and without the consumer familiarity that makes certain positioning claims land the way they're intended.
This creates a specific challenge for premium brands entering new markets. The signals that communicate premium in one context, packaging design language, price point relative to category norms, retail channel selection, sometimes communicate differently in a market where those conventions don't have the same meaning. A brand that is perceived as accessible and democratic in its home market can inadvertently land as exclusive and inaccessible in a new one, or vice versa.
Getting this right requires more than translating the existing brand assets. It requires an honest assessment of what the brand actually means to a consumer who has never encountered it before, and building the go-to-market strategy around that reality rather than the reality the brand team is familiar with.
A Case That Illustrates All Three
A few years ago I worked with a premium beverage brand preparing to expand into multiple LATAM markets simultaneously. The product was strong, the parent company had resources, and the team was experienced. On paper, the expansion should have been straightforward.
The reality was more complicated. Distribution in the target markets was highly fragmented, with no single partner capable of delivering national coverage. Local competitors had years of established relationships with the key traditional trade accounts. And the brand's premium positioning, which had driven growth in its home market, needed to be recalibrated for markets where the price architecture in the category was structured differently and the premium tier meant something different to the consumer.
We rebuilt the go-to-market strategy from the consumer insight out. That meant identifying the right distributor partners in each market based on category expertise and account relationships rather than scale alone. It meant negotiating retail presence in the specific high-visibility accounts where the target consumer actually shopped, rather than pursuing broad distribution that would dilute the premium positioning before the brand had established its meaning. And it meant adapting the messaging in each market to connect with the specific cultural context rather than translating the home market campaign.
The results over the following three years were double-digit compound annual growth, entry into seven new markets, and measurable improvement in EBITDA. None of that came from having a better product than the competition. It came from a go-to-market strategy built around the actual market dynamics rather than the assumed ones.
The Lessons That Apply Every Time
Brand awareness does not travel with you. Every market entry starts from zero in terms of consumer familiarity, and the investment required to build local relevance is always underestimated in the planning phase. Budget for it explicitly.
Your hero SKU at home may not be your best entry point in a new market. The product that drives the most volume in your core market is often not the right lead product for a market where the category dynamics, price architecture, and consumer needs are structured differently. Let the market tell you what the right entry point is before you commit.
The right local partners accelerate everything and the wrong ones cost you years. Distribution partnerships in LATAM and in the U.S. Hispanic market are not interchangeable. The right partner brings category relationships, market knowledge, and commercial discipline that no amount of corporate resources can substitute. Invest in finding them before you need them.
Positioning requires translation, not just adaptation. Taking your existing brand positioning and adapting the language for a new market is not enough. The positioning itself, what the brand stands for and who it is for, needs to be evaluated against the specific consumer reality of the new market and rebuilt from there if necessary.
A Peer Perspective
The work I do at The Better Peer is built directly on these experiences. Not as a traditional consultant who has observed market expansion from the outside, but as someone who has made the actual calls, built the distributor relationships, negotiated the retail space, and lived with the consequences of both good and bad strategic decisions across markets.
When a CPG brand is preparing to enter LATAM or to compete more effectively in the U.S. Hispanic market, the most valuable thing I can offer is not a framework. It is the specific, operationally grounded perspective of someone who has been inside the decisions that matter, and who can help you see the mistakes before you make them rather than after.
If you are considering expansion into LATAM or the U.S. Hispanic market, that is exactly the conversation I am built for.


Comments